Newbie Question(s) so dumb, you're afraid to even ask!

Ryuzaki

お前はもう死んでいる
Moderator
BuSo Pro
Digital Strategist
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
5,015
Likes
9,609
Degree
9
Following the low comp low volume method, what do you generally expect for page views per month per article?

Would a low end estimate of around 200 be suitable to avoid inflating expectations?
Sure. A keyword with 100 search volume might get 40 clicks per month at the #1 spot, but you'll also rank for a lot of keyword variations, synonyms, and long tails. At the same time, many you won't rank for and some you'll rank for that get way more traffic than you ever expected.

Any low comp / low volume method needs to be compensated for by publishing at higher volume by casting way more fishing rods, in which case worrying about the average estimated monthly traffic to each doesn't really matter. What you end up feeding off of is the whales you find, not all the tiny little fish. Those might end up making up 20% of your total traffic. The whales will make up 80%.

You're not looking for whales. You're just casting tons of rods. The success isn't in what gets caught on the fishing line. It's in the act of casting the rods correctly (keyword research, on-page, and so forth). What comes after shouldn't be the focus, because if you're doing it right enough times, it will come regardless.

Hey guys,

I am curious to note when it comes to building silos - is it best practice to find supporting articles with keywords that are within your Avalanche Search Volume?

Or would a supporting article purely be for topical relevance so it can boost the main article?

Or is it good to mix the two?

I ask this because there are some money keywords I am targeting, but I am struggling to find some supporting articles that are within my Avalanche SV and low competition.

There are some KW opportunities but the competition is fierce (KD 30-40/100 according to KW Finder, SERPs dominated by DR 40 - 90s).

Any input is much appreciated!
It's not a black or white issue. If you can find keywords to use for topical relevance that you can rank for now, then by all means go for it. If you can't find ones you can rank for now, but they still support the money keyword, they're still worth publishing. You may be able to rank for them later if you don't ignore link building. If you never rank for them, they're still worth having, and will still eventually earn their keep.

Is it always best to hire via Upwork and effectively train/sculpt writers into the beasts you want them to be or sometimes are content farm/textbrokers simply the fastest/best way to get content clusters nailed?
No, it's not always best. It depends on your goals, your demands, your needs, and who can meet those needs. Volume is one particular issue that determines which is best. If you want to reach volume with your own team, you'll spend all the time and opportunity cost training, evaluating, firing, hiring, training, hiring someone to do all that and training them, dealing with editors and all that. Or you can pay an agency to take care of that for you.

Crap like TextBrokers doesn't bring the same benefits as an agency, though it'll come at the same costs most of the time. If I'm paying a premium, I want the benefits, which mainly include all the hiring and training and firing and editing and mainly accountability.

About aging posts and editing.

I ordered a bunch of articles that are ready to edit. A lot of them aren't optimized yet (not formatted properly for the snippet, possibly low CTR because of the intro, no images, OBL, etc.)

But, the articles are 85% there in terms of content scope, so I won't be changing them drastically or anything.

My question is, do I publish them immediately, and then play the editor? So that Google sees them and the post ages, etc.

Or do the usual, which is to edit each article with formatting, images, links, etc. All before publishing.

I really don't want my posts to sit around, not aging, but at the same time, I don't want Google to recalculate the post's rankings because of editing further down the line. Thank you.
My opinion is to get them up to snuff then publish. Then you can move on with your life. Otherwise you're feeding Google sub-par crap and you'll tank your sitewide quality score for a long time. Even if you come back around and fix them rather quickly, you can wait for 6 months for your quality score to recover (we're talking Panda here).

Plus, you're just leaving open loops in your mind and your work flow. The next question becomes "do I go ahead and publish 100 more unfinished articles or do I finish the ones I already published and 'slow down' my progress". Just do it right the first time so life can move on.
 
Joined
Aug 8, 2021
Messages
6
Likes
4
Degree
0
Sure. A keyword with 100 search volume might get 40 clicks per month at the #1 spot, but you'll also rank for a lot of keyword variations, synonyms, and long tails. At the same time, many you won't rank for and some you'll rank for that get way more traffic than you ever expected.

Any low comp / low volume method needs to be compensated for by publishing at higher volume by casting way more fishing rods, in which case worrying about the average estimated monthly traffic to each doesn't really matter. What you end up feeding off of is the whales you find, not all the tiny little fish. Those might end up making up 20% of your total traffic. The whales will make up 80%.

You're not looking for whales. You're just casting tons of rods. The success isn't in what gets caught on the fishing line. It's in the act of casting the rods correctly (keyword research, on-page, and so forth). What comes after shouldn't be the focus, because if you're doing it right enough times, it will come regardless.


It's not a black or white issue. If you can find keywords to use for topical relevance that you can rank for now, then by all means go for it. If you can't find ones you can rank for now, but they still support the money keyword, they're still worth publishing. You may be able to rank for them later if you don't ignore link building. If you never rank for them, they're still worth having, and will still eventually earn their keep.


No, it's not always best. It depends on your goals, your demands, your needs, and who can meet those needs. Volume is one particular issue that determines which is best. If you want to reach volume with your own team, you'll spend all the time and opportunity cost training, evaluating, firing, hiring, training, hiring someone to do all that and training them, dealing with editors and all that. Or you can pay an agency to take care of that for you.

Crap like TextBrokers doesn't bring the same benefits as an agency, though it'll come at the same costs most of the time. If I'm paying a premium, I want the benefits, which mainly include all the hiring and training and firing and editing and mainly accountability.


My opinion is to get them up to snuff then publish. Then you can move on with your life. Otherwise you're feeding Google sub-par crap and you'll tank your sitewide quality score for a long time. Even if you come back around and fix them rather quickly, you can wait for 6 months for your quality score to recover (we're talking Panda here).

Plus, you're just leaving open loops in your mind and your work flow. The next question becomes "do I go ahead and publish 100 more unfinished articles or do I finish the ones I already published and 'slow down' my progress". Just do it right the first time so life can move on.
Appreciate the reply, thank you.

Also, have another question; I've gotten to the point where my website is getting a decent amount of traffic and I am starting to get outreached for guest posts.

My initial thoughts are to stay away as I value the quality of my content too much, but at the same time if I set strict guidelines, would it not be beneficial to get someone to write for me in exchange for a backlink and some cash?

I would do my due diligence and vet the website properly to ensure that they are relevant to my niche, and if they provide good content that my audience would enjoy.

But is there a downside to accepting guest posts for $$? Is there anything else I should be suspicious about?
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2019
Messages
221
Likes
402
Degree
1
Appreciate the reply, thank you.

Also, have another question; I've gotten to the point where my website is getting a decent amount of traffic and I am starting to get outreached for guest posts.

My initial thoughts are to stay away as I value the quality of my content too much, but at the same time if I set strict guidelines, would it not be beneficial to get someone to write for me in exchange for a backlink and some cash?

I would do my due diligence and vet the website properly to ensure that they are relevant to my niche, and if they provide good content that my audience would enjoy.

But is there a downside to accepting guest posts for $$? Is there anything else I should be suspicious about?

Tell them you want $250+ per sponsored post and you'll filter out the spammy requests from the legit brands real quick. I haven't had an issue doing that.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2021
Messages
18
Likes
8
Degree
0
Appreciate the reply, thank you.

Also, have another question; I've gotten to the point where my website is getting a decent amount of traffic and I am starting to get outreached for guest posts.

My initial thoughts are to stay away as I value the quality of my content too much, but at the same time if I set strict guidelines, would it not be beneficial to get someone to write for me in exchange for a backlink and some cash?

I would do my due diligence and vet the website properly to ensure that they are relevant to my niche, and if they provide good content that my audience would enjoy.

But is there a downside to accepting guest posts for $$? Is there anything else I should be suspicious about?
What do you value more - the content, or the cash?

If you are enjoying good traffic, and getting paid for guest posts is an incremental addition to your revenue, I would stay away as the risks to accepting cash for a dofollow link outweighs the benefits.

If money is not the motivator here, and the destination link is good, what I would suggest is that you do keyword research of your own and suggest them a topic to write on, along with detailed outline of the headers you want to include in the article.

This way, you are basically outsourcing content production to a company and paying them with a backlink.
 
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Messages
2
Likes
0
Degree
0
Should I be concerned that my new 3-month-old website (on a new domain) is doing very poorly or is it still too early to tell?

By poorly, I mean half of my keywords aren’t found by Serprobot, while the others are on page 3-6 in the SERPs. The thing is, all of the keywords are low volume (10-70), KGR, and have zero competition (no relevant sites, only a few forums in the top 5 at best). All of them are indexed on Google if I search for site:mysite.com, though. Most of them have been aging for at least 2 months already.

My previous and relatively successful website was already ranking in the top 10 for a bunch of its keywords in the same timeframe and with the same number of articles. I also think that my On-Page and KW research is decent at least since I got my previous website to ~30k visitors a month in under a year without any backlinks at all and with less than 50 articles.

I can’t tell if I’m impatient and overthinking it or if it’s an actual problem and requires a separate thread.
 

Ryuzaki

お前はもう死んでいる
Moderator
BuSo Pro
Digital Strategist
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
5,015
Likes
9,609
Degree
9
Should I be concerned that my new 3-month-old website (on a new domain) is doing very poorly or is it still too early to tell?

By poorly, I mean half of my keywords aren’t found by Serprobot, while the others are on page 3-6 in the SERPs. The thing is, all of the keywords are low volume (10-70), KGR, and have zero competition (no relevant sites, only a few forums in the top 5 at best). All of them are indexed on Google if I search for site:mysite.com, though. Most of them have been aging for at least 2 months already.

My previous and relatively successful website was already ranking in the top 10 for a bunch of its keywords in the same timeframe and with the same number of articles. I also think that my On-Page and KW research is decent at least since I got my previous website to ~30k visitors a month in under a year without any backlinks at all and with less than 50 articles.

I can’t tell if I’m impatient and overthinking it or if it’s an actual problem and requires a separate thread.
It's waaay too soon. And you're going to need some backlinks. It doesn't matter how low competition the keywords are. The pages that are ranking may not have any backlinks and page rank, but the domains those pages are on most certainly do.
 
Joined
Mar 19, 2019
Messages
352
Likes
261
Degree
1
How much plagiarism is too much in your opinion? Just put a few articles of mine through some checkers and Quetext in particular seemed to believe that some of my articles were 5% to 10% plagiarised (they're all unique and I don't even use references for these articles BTW). Was just curious!
 
Joined
Oct 11, 2020
Messages
1
Likes
0
Degree
0
I have a question about duplicate content and I’m not sure if google will light me up for it.

say I’m writing a post “how to clean red carpet” and another “how to clean green carpet” and the content is exactly the same but maybe a paragraph of variation.

mis it duplicate content? Even if I wrote the keywords for two different people searching something for THEIR carpet color and how to clean it
 
Joined
Aug 5, 2021
Messages
2
Likes
1
Degree
0
I'm running a 2-month-old blog with about 35 articles published. I don't have much traffic yet but majority of my current traffic is from tier 1 countries. I've recently signed up for Amazon affiliate program and I'd like some advice on the best way to add affiliate links on the already indexed posts.
 

Ryuzaki

お前はもう死んでいる
Moderator
BuSo Pro
Digital Strategist
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
5,015
Likes
9,609
Degree
9
I have a question about duplicate content and I’m not sure if google will light me up for it.

say I’m writing a post “how to clean red carpet” and another “how to clean green carpet” and the content is exactly the same but maybe a paragraph of variation.

mis it duplicate content? Even if I wrote the keywords for two different people searching something for THEIR carpet color and how to clean it

Unless you rewrite it and make it unique to robots (even if humans realize it's similar), you're going to fall into the Farmer Update trap. These are called "doorway pages" and exist simply to eat up SERP real estate for random longer-tail keyword variations.

Google dealt with this around a decade ago when Demand Media was publishing insane amounts of content for tiny volume keyword variations like this. Demand was on top of the world, and they got crushed so bad and annoyed enough people that they even changed their name.

You can write both of those articles if you make them unique. Doing even a dozen of them isn't going to hurt you. Doing tens of thousands will.

Just pay someone to rewrite them and remix them so they're unique and not ad-libbed or copy and paste.

I'm running a 2-month-old blog with about 35 articles published. I don't have much traffic yet but majority of my current traffic is from tier 1 countries. I've recently signed up for Amazon affiliate program and I'd like some advice on the best way to add affiliate links on the already indexed posts.

Skim your articles, and if you mention some type of product you can suggest one with text links. If you have images of products, link them, or use a caption beneath the image to link to them. If the post is the type where you suggest a lot of products, you can even create a list near the top like "Products Suggested in This Article" and link to them all.

There's no rules here, just put them in there. You can do comparison tables and all that, whatever you find works. If the post is about a product, you can use buttons and calls to action and all that to really entice a click.

The best way to understand how to get it done is to search keywords you know are full of affiliates and browse around, observing how lots of sites are doing it. That'll help you feel comfortable in feeling that you understand what to do, then just do it!