What's your take on AI generated content?

zak said:
That's probably not because it's AI.

My AI site indexes fine on Bing.
But my non-AI site was deindexed by Bing for over a year.
Click to expand...
AI content is blocked from indexing while the one provided by the writer is indexed.

The site is not deindexed.
 
ianovici said:
Bing detects AI content and is blocking it from being indexed.

V1AOxBT.png


There was someone on BS that was making content with OpenAI so I wanted to play a little bit with it. Will try different methods to see if I manage to index it.
Click to expand...
Love this.

A URL discovered two days ago won't get indexed with zero context provided, no showing what a page is, what the niche is, what the domain is, no providing a snippet of content, absolutely nothing, and that's it. Bing detects and blocks it because AI bad.
 
Currently, I've started a new MFA sites based on digital strategy course of BuSo. But i'm afraid to grow my traffic because of ChatGPT. Maximum of my keywords are short question and answer that ChatGPT is perfect to answer. Will really be dead SEO for ChatGPT?
 
Boy said:
Love this.

A URL discovered two days ago won't get indexed with zero context provided, no showing what a page is, what the niche is, what the domain is, no providing a snippet of content, absolutely nothing, and that's it. Bing detects and blocks it because AI bad.
Click to expand...
It's a 2 year old domain, already ranking for stuff. It has over 70 articles on it and it's doing ok in Bing.

I decided to put 2 articles on it, one made with AI and one written by a person. The one with AI does not want to get indexed and the other one does.

I'll contact support to see what they can tell me.

vy4GbPW.png
 
ianovici said:
It's a 2 year old domain, already ranking for stuff. It has over 70 articles on it and it's doing ok in Bing.

I decided to put 2 articles on it, one made with AI and one written by a person. The one with AI does not want to get indexed and the other one does.

I'll contact support to see what they can tell me.

vy4GbPW.png
Click to expand...
An n count of 1 does not provide statistical significance. Imagine the opposite. Someone comes in with 2 AI-generated posts that are indexed. Does that completely refute your point?

xCNePFb.png
 
Boy said:
An n count of 1 does not provide statistical significance. Imagine the opposite. Someone comes in with 2 AI-generated posts that are indexed. Does that completely refute your point?

xCNePFb.png
Click to expand...
Yes, it does. If you managed to index AI content that refutes my point.

The issue for my indexing problem seems to be because of indexNow. The site in question has Cloudflare with indexNow active.
For some reason, the AI content triggers some sort of filter, the non-AI content gets indexed.
 
I love it. If you've ever hired writers or even designers, you have seen how inconsistent and slow they can be. AI takes a fraction of the time and cost and IMO provides BETTER content.

I am personally loving my AI art journey right now - just doing stuff for fun and improving my prompts.
 
I believe @bernard mentioned Deepfakes about porn, but now we are starting to see new takes. Obviously our scumbag affiliate friends are at the forefront of this (Now think of these deepfakes being sent straight to email inboxes, bypassing any "bans"):


credit @eliquid for sourcing this.

Now you can get anyone to "sponsor" anything... Scary stuff. It's why I made sure there were no new photos or videos of me for the last 15+ years online... Good luck.

1UAy5VB.gifQ
 
ianovici said:
Yes, it does. If you managed to index AI content that refutes my point.

The issue for my indexing problem seems to be because of indexNow. The site in question has Cloudflare with indexNow active.
For some reason, the AI content triggers some sort of filter, the non-AI content gets indexed.
Click to expand...
What do you mean by indexNow being the cause of your indexing problem?
 
ChatGPT v. 4 seems noticeably better at writing content than v. 3.

It's not even comparable, it's significantly more natural. It has much more varied and natural language and it doesn't repeat itself all the time. I feel quite good about publishing v. 4 content, but caveat, not blind writing, but writing from data, research and instructions.
 
@googlealchemist I was using indexNow in Cloudflare and RankMath to submit those posts to be indexed. The URLs were sent multiple times, something like 20 times, to the api in bing. I contacted support in bing and they fixed it.

I've disabled the feature in Cloudflare and in RankMath, I don't know which one was faulty.
 
bernard said:
ChatGPT v. 4 seems noticeably better at writing content than v. 3.

It's not even comparable, it's significantly more natural. It has much more varied and natural language and it doesn't repeat itself all the time. I feel quite good about publishing v. 4 content, but caveat, not blind writing, but writing from data, research and instructions.
Click to expand...
Agree, version 4 is a ton better. I am sitting on a ton of content ideas begging for an AI base with human oversight/edit.... not sure if I pull the trigger though
 
Darth said:
Agree, version 4 is a ton better. I am sitting on a ton of content ideas begging for an AI base with human oversight/edit.... not sure if I pull the trigger though
Click to expand...

I think about it as "fill in the blanks" in the content I use AI for. Like we've discussed in the past, would a cheap writer who writes from a detailed template, really be that much different from an AI? How much information was there pr. 100 words vs fluff?

Personally, I focus on contributing unique research and data, this is clearly what Google wants with the (experience). If I have the template, the data, the subheaders, the structure, the expert quotes, the tone of voice etc and then use the AI to "fill in the blanks", is that really AI content or is it just putting into words the content that I made.

I see that as different than just telling it to write some content, but it could be a cope, we'll see.
 
As MS demo for copilot showed it's quite good at analysing data/coming up with insights. They might not be groundbreaking to an expert who makes hundreds of thousands in the field or whatever but they're better than a 4-10c/word writer was going to do - none of them are spending an hour analysing the data at all and coming up with anything other than glaringly obvious insights. So you might actually be doing better by using AI to fill in those gaps for you by quite a long way unless you're paying serious money for your content.
 
Either I am getting too old or the Matrix is accelerating at an increasing rate:
 
Steve Brownlie said:
As MS demo for copilot showed it's quite good at analysing data/coming up with insights. They might not be groundbreaking to an expert who makes hundreds of thousands in the field or whatever but they're better than a 4-10c/word writer was going to do - none of them are spending an hour analysing the data at all and coming up with anything other than glaringly obvious insights. So you might actually be doing better by using AI to fill in those gaps for you by quite a long way unless you're paying serious money for your content.
Click to expand...

I agree, it's not going to bomb with its delivery and just write a bunch of nonsense either.

There are some traps and holes to fall into though. There's the question of repetition, which was a huge issue in v. 3. It was not varied enough in its language when it didn't have enough data. It would basically bullshit and use flowery wording to get around not having an actual data or not understanding the data.

Still experimenting, but for some stuff it really is excellent, and as you said, for writing some basic "how to" or "Buyers guide", then it definitely beats the cheap(ish) writer, particularly v 4 and you can imo get around some of the robotic feeling of the text by prompting tone of voice etc. I want to experiment and see if I can get it to add a few jokes in there too.

It's really going to hit it off once you can feed it videos, images and website urls.

CCarter said:
Either I am getting too old or the Matrix is accelerating at an increasing rate:
Click to expand...

God damn, haha and the worst thing is that it could probably work, at least on dating apps.
 
The problem is: if Google has an algo to deal with low-level AI content it will probably smash the good ones. Everyone and their grandmother are writing content to get rich now. I can see the promos on Youtube: "Make 100,000 dollars while watching TV"

The arguments here convinced me to not use AI
 
Do you all think A.I. content is fine on ad-monetized sites? I'm not so much worried about SERPs as I am pissing off an ad network.
 
Jared said:
Do you all think A.I. content is fine on ad-monetized sites? I'm not so much worried about SERPs as I am pissing off an ad network.
Click to expand...
I imagine they care more about the visitors viewing the ads being real. Basically, if Adsense accepts you, you’re generally good to go. Keep it family friendly and I don’t imagine there will be a problem.
 
After much consideration and a sufficient number of highballs an old SEO buddy sold me on the idea that they'll be neutral on it so it can proliferate and naturally everyone will leverage it too hard and then G will finally drop a big scary war hammer on it all in an old school "Panda-level type event".

Panda 2.0
Pandageddon
The 'Sentient Panda'
John Panda Conner
The Pandacolypse

....and then all will return to normal, just like people will still buy/sell links there will also be people still try trying to cheap out on content production but Google's primary objective will have been achieved; instilling enough fear to minimize its impact to their core product.
 
bernard said:
get around some of the robotic feeling of the text by prompting tone of voice etC
Click to expand...
that first part, for whatever reason, really seems strange to me...something about it 'understanding' different tone of voice...is eerie....

like the Boss mentioned above...basement dwellers are really in for it. dating apps and porn are fake and destructive enough already.

when they tie this into real dolls...i might have to start having kids myself to keep the species going

(half) jokes aside...

leaving out moneysite and even primary t1 asset content production directly...

and especially with the latest version 4...im wondering if it would be at least good for cranking out descriptions for citations to help them with some uniqueness, bulk ecomm type product descriptions...stuff like that

shorter stuff that would otherwise probably just be kind of rewritten (or dup) and redundant anyways

at most for now, ill use it similar to what some of you guys are talking about, more of a template/researching assistant moving forward with a lot of specific prompts and manual oversight.

i dont even like the idea of using it for pbn content for the same reasons i wont slap it on a moneysite...dont want them getting tagged now or in the future if/when they lay the hammer down at least once initially for reasons gone over in above posts.

and maybe i shouldnt even use the term 'pbn' here on BUSO as i realize i might understandably open myself up to a bashing. old habits/terminology...probably better called my own niche edits or mininets?

bernard said:
It's really going to hit it off once you can feed it videos, images and website urls
Click to expand...

this is where it starts getting really interesting (or maybe more problematic?) to me and what ive been thinking about more and more, especially as i read more about prompts being able to create topical maps, customer profiles and the like. not just for the niche in general, but especially coupled with my specific data for the same

i think im going to rewatch the Terminator franchise with some good weed and have a deep think on all this
 
AI is a good tool when you know how to use it. IMO really depends how you prompt it...

"Write me a question to ask in use in a email"
"Using this google review "GOOGLE REVIEW", write me a positive and thoughtful comment. One sentence max."

Big difference in output and can be used in cold emails without raising much red flags.

Same principle applies to writing articles.
 
Here we go... Now A.I. are able to figure out the "next set of tasks" they need to perform for your initial requests. Introducing BabyAGI:


Forget taking your jobs, now they are going to be taking your managers' jobs by thinking ahead on what YOU need to be up to.

At least with ChatGPT you still had to think ahead. This may require no thinking...

nUThJan.jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back