What do you think of Mozilla's new logo?

Samwise89

Samwise89

Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
477
Likes
323
Degree
2
ke0nRhk.jpg


Given that the old one was plain text with a specific plain font (maybe some special kerning), this is probably an upgrade.

They are aimed at nerds for the most part, and any semi-nerds will be educated on the :// part by other blogs and forums. But what about the vast number of normal non-techie nerds? Did they betray the normies?

Let's not forget, even though they are a tech company talking to tech people, the majority of their users are normal internet users who need a browser to check emails and simple things.

I'm not a fan, if I had to choose one way or the other.
 
I'm not even sure what the :// is supposed to resemble. One of those sad face things? And no more orange? How does one change from orange to blue lol, not a fan at all.
 
Michael said:
I'm not even sure what the :// is supposed to resemble. One of those sad face things? And no more orange? How does one change from orange to blue lol, not a fan at all.
Click to expand...
Please not serious... It's :// as in http://
 
I saw it and immediately thought of the Mobil logo:

Exxon-mobil-logo-3.jpg


Turning the ill into the colon and double forward slash is a clever idea, it's just been executed in an ugly, boring way.
 
They weren't the first either. Curl got in before:

good_curl_logo.png
 
I kinda like it. Don't think it's too bad
 
whack ! weak ! terrible. First 3 words I think

I dont use drugs but i think when i see this 'oz" stands out LOL. :D

Then i see a pipe
 
Seems like whenever a company releases a new logo everyone bitches about it (don't mean specifically people in this thread, just saying in general)
 
Prentzz said:
Please not serious... It's :// as in http://
Click to expand...

Interesting. When I first saw it just glancing at it I thought they were commenting out the "a" as in comments noted as //. Probably over analyzing it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back